Free to read, always. Go ad-free and support independent news from £1 a month. See membership
Skip to content
READ THE DAY. UNDERSTAND BRITAIN.ABOUTCONTACTJOINSIGN INTHE DAILY EDITION
THEBritishBanner

Est. 2026

News · Politics · Money · Sport · Life & Culture

Design inspired by The British Banner, London, 1848.

BRITAIN & THE WORLD01 NOVEMBER 2026DIGITAL EDITION
Politics

PMQs: Burnham defends EU red lines before Budget

Andy Burnham speaking at the 2016 Labour Party conference, archive photo
Andy Burnham at the Labour Party conference in Liverpool, 28 September 2016. Archive photo, not the 2026 PMQs sitting. Photo: Rwendland / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0. Cropped from the original; this cropped image is also CC BY-SA 4.0.

PMQs on Wednesday 28 October brought a clash over Brexit and free movement before John Healey began delivering the Budget. Kemi Badenoch pressed Andy Burnham to clarify whether he wanted another referendum, while the prime minister said Labour’s manifesto red lines remained in place for this Parliament.

The exchanges matter because opening a debate about Britain’s relationship with the EU is not the same as announcing a change in policy. BBC and Guardian live reporting both describe Burnham defending efforts to secure a closer relationship while maintaining the existing limits.

PMQs: Badenoch presses on a referendum

Badenoch asked whether Burnham wanted a referendum on rejoining the EU and later pressed him to rule out a vote on the EU or single market. She argued that the country did not want to reopen the arguments surrounding Brexit.

Burnham said the manifesto red lines would stay. Those commitments rule out a return to free movement, the single market and a customs union. He also argued that the Conservatives had delivered a harder Brexit than voters had been promised.

That is a political dispute about the existing settlement and the government’s negotiating aims. It is not evidence that a new UK-EU agreement has been reached or that the rules on migration have changed.

Our earlier explanation of the free movement debate set out the distinction between discussing options, seeking a mandate and implementing a policy. Wednesday’s answers put the manifesto boundary back at the centre of that debate.

Kemi Badenoch in her official parliamentary portrait
Kemi Badenoch in her official parliamentary portrait, July 2024. Archive photo, not the 28 October PMQs sitting. Photo: House of Commons / Roger Harris, CC BY 3.0. Official 3:2 crop.

PMQs: a closer EU relationship, within limits

The Guardian reported Burnham pointing to an EU summit in three weeks as an opportunity to seek a better deal. He said business organisations supported efforts to improve the relationship.

Badenoch challenged the timing, asking why the prime minister had opened the free movement discussion during Budget week. She defended the referendum result and argued that voters should not have to go through the debate again.

Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey separately asked about joining the single market and customs union. The BBC reported Burnham replying that the government would not do those things in this Parliament.

That time limit is important. It describes the government’s stated position for the current Parliament, rather than settling every future question about Britain’s relationship with Europe.

Care, devolution and North Sea decisions

Davey also raised the proposed change to the carer’s allowance cliff edge. He welcomed the direction but criticised the timetable and asked to discuss how the system could make work pay for family carers. Burnham said he was prepared to meet him and wanted a cross-party consensus.

Plaid Cymru’s Liz Saville Roberts pressed the prime minister on economic powers for Wales. Burnham said he was ready to make an offer similar to Scotland’s, including greater devolution of employment support.

Reform MP Danny Kruger asked whether the Budget calculations assumed approval of the Rosebank field. Burnham described the decision as a matter for the energy secretary and a quasi-judicial process. That answer did not announce approval.

Energy had dominated last week’s PMQs exchanges over Jackdaw and gas standing charges. The questions on Wednesday continued that argument without replacing the separate decisions ministers must take.

Watch the official Parliament coverage

The combined PMQs and Budget stream is hosted on YouTube. Loading it connects to YouTube and may share your IP address and device data. Nothing loads until you choose to load it.

Watch the official UK Parliament stream

Official UK Parliament coverage of PMQs and the Budget on 28 October. This is the combined parliamentary stream, not a PMQs-only recording.

This report covers the PMQs exchanges on 28 October, before the Budget statement. Our earlier coverage of reported business rates plans is pre-Budget context, not confirmation of the final measures.

Sources: BBC live reporting, Guardian live reporting and the official UK Parliament stream. This report was first prepared from BBC and Guardian live reporting. The uncorrected Hansard transcript now confirms the exchanges and remains subject to correction.

Have your say

What should the government prioritise in its EU talks?

1 comment

  1. Alex Matthews 1 November 2026, 00:58

    What would you most like to see change in the UK-EU relationship, and why?

Join the discussion